Since Hadoop was released onto the market ten years ago, it has continued to expand and advance. Every single Hadoop version and abstraction aims to address a specific flaw in data processing, storage, or analysis. Facebook developed Apache Hive to organize and manage the massive datasets stored in Hadoop's shared storage. Hadoop MapReduce is abstracted by Apache Hive, which also includes its own SQL-like language called HiveQL. In order to overcome the constraints brought on the Hadoop Sql's poor interactivity, Cloudera Impala was created. Data must only be kept on Hadoop clusters for Cloudera Impala to deliver low delay, high-performance SQL-like queries for processing and analyzing data. Big data aficionados have not been at all disappointed by the recent data boom. The issues it has brought about and the new sectors it has spawned the need for constant innovation in how we use technology. Big Data is constantly expanding. It keeps putting pressure on already-existing data processing, analysis, and query platforms to enhance their capabilities without sacrificing accuracy and speed. Numerous comparisons have been made, and they frequently provide conflicting conclusions. It is mentioned that Cloudera Impala & Apache Hive are two formidable rivals striving for recognition in the database searching field. Although Hadoop has unmistakably become the go-to data warehousing platform, the Cloudera Impala vs. Hive argument won't go away.
In order to provide data query and analysis, Apache Hive is a data warehouse software package built on top of Apache Hadoop. Hive provides a SQL-like interface for querying data held in a variety of Hadoop-integrated databases and storage systems. Apache Hive is unquestionably the way to go if you want to take advantage of your expertise with SQL while using a sophisticated analytics language (without coding MapReduce tasks separately). In any case, HiveQL requests are transformed into a correlating MapReduce job that runs on the cluster & provides the desired result.
Since it facilitates the analysis of huge datasets kept in HDFS as well as additional compatible file systems like Amazon S3, Apache Hive is flexible in its application. It offers a SQL-like language (HiveQL) with schema on reading & seamlessly transforms queries to MapReduce, Apache Tez, and Spark processes to keep traditional database query designers engaged. Additional attributes of Hive include:
Become a Hadoop Certified professional by learning this HKR Hadoop Training
It is an Apache Hadoop-powered computer cluster's open-source massively parallel SQL query engine for data storage. Impala was created in 2012 and has been compared to Google F1 as the open-source version. Because Cloudera Impala doesn't need moving or transforming data before processing, it is a great option for programmers executing queries on HDFS & Apache HBase. As its data and file formats, metadata, protection, and resource planning protocols are identical to those in use by MapReduce, Apache Hive, Apache Pig, as well as other Hadoop software, Cloudera Impala integrates with the Hadoop ecosystem with ease.
Impala significantly improves performance metrics by doing away with the requirement to move huge data sets to specialized processing systems or change data formats before analysis. Impala's key characteristics include:
The fact that Impala now has support from Amazon Web Services, as well as MapR, may be used to measure its rise in only a little over two years.
Now let us learn about some of the major differences between Hive and Impala:
Hive was created by Facebook. On other hand, Impala is the creation of the Apache Software Foundation.
Hive supports Sequence files, Optimized row columnar (ORC) format with Zlib compression, Text File, and RC file format.
Impala supports the Parquet format with snappy compression, Sequence file, Avro, and LZO.
Hive has been written using JAVA.
Impala has been written using C++.
Hive is significantly slower than Impala, however, with the release of Hive 2.0 with LLAP support, the difference is getting less clear. The performance benefit is primarily because of the absence of traditional MapReduce. Impala does not have the startup delays or excessive I/O operations associated with Hive because it uses MPP rather than MapReduce. Impala outperforms Hive in terms of performance since it doesn't need to convert data types or transfer huge data sets before running queries.
Hive has higher Latency.
Impala has low Latency.
Hive utilizes RC files and ORC for storage support
Impala utilizes Hadoop and Apache Hbase for storage support.
Hive generates Query expression at the time of compilation.
In Impala, code is generated at runtime.
Hive does not support parallel processing.
On the other hand, Impala supports parallel Processing.
Hive supports MapReduce whereas Impala does not.
Hive does not support Hadoop security, whereas Impala supports Kerberos Authentication.
If you are thinking about undertaking an upgrade job, the hive would be your best option. Compatibility is a crucial element to consider.
If you're just starting on a new project, Impala is the better option among the two.
Hive supports Fault-tolerance.
Impala does not support Fault tolerance.
Hive has support for complex types.
Impala does not support complex types.
Hive is a batch-centric MapReduce.
Impala is an MPP database.
Interactive Computing is not supported in Hive.
Impala supports interactive computing.
Hive is fault-tolerant, therefore even if a data node fails while the query is being executed, the output of the query will still be produced.
A data node goes down while the query is being executed, and Impala restarts.
Resource Management of Hive is YARN.
Whereas, the resource management of Impala is Native*YARN.
HIVE - Hadoop Distributions, Hortonworks (Tez, LLAP)
Impala - Cloudera MapR, (*Amazon EMR)
The target audience for HIVE is primarily, Data Engineers.
The primary target audience of Impala is Data analysts & Data Scientists.
HIVE has a throughput rate.
Impala has a low throughput rate.
Hive LLAP's dynamic runtime capabilities reduce the amount of labor required in general. Therefore, we may conclude that using Hive LLAP requires less time.
Impala takes less time to process simpler queries than Hive LLAP, but more time to process complicated queries.
Become a Big Data Hadoop Certified professional by learning this HKR Big Data Hadoop Training
Get ahead in your career with our Hadoop Tutorial!
In this essay, we have attempted to demonstrate the two technologies of Hive and Impala as well as their fundamental distinctions. Practically speaking, we can argue that Hive & Impala are not rivals because they have the same MapReduce base for query execution. However, how they are used may differ. We can utilize it separately or in combination depending on our needs and the best option is given compatibility, requirement, and performance. Whilst Impala remains memory intensive and struggles to handle complex data operations, such as join queries, Hive QL is a very flexible and universal language. Hive will perform better in cases where your project's work involves batch processing for a lot of data, but Impala will perform better in situations where your work involves real-time processing of ad-hoc data queries.
Batch starts on 24th Mar 2023, Fast Track batch
Batch starts on 28th Mar 2023, Weekday batch
Batch starts on 1st Apr 2023, Weekend batch
A: Impala uses MPP (massively parallel processing), whereas Hive uses MapReduce internally, which results in certain early overheads. Impala, therefore, gives a faster response.
A: An Apache Hadoop-powered computer cluster can store data in Apache Impala, an open-source massively parallel processing (MPP) SQL query engine. Google F1, which served as inspiration for Impala's 2012 development, has been compared to Impala as the open-source version.
A: No as, Impala does not take the place of frameworks for batch processing based on MapReduce, such as Hive. Long-running batch tasks, for instance, those requiring batch execution of Extract, Transform, and Load (ETL) type processes, are ideally suited for Hive and other MapReduce-based frameworks.
A: Atomic, consistent, isolated, and durable (ACID) transactions are supported by Hive. The MERGE statement, that now also complies with ACID requirements, can be used to update data.